From Vacancies to Better Care: How Faster Hiring Improves Patient Outcomes

The NHS exists to provide timely, high-quality care to patients. Yet one of the biggest barriers to meeting patient needs today is not a lack of medical breakthroughs or funding per se; it’s the lack of staff.

Across the UK, staff shortages are delaying treatments and increasing wait times. NHS leaders have openly said that workforce shortages are a key reason waiting lists have hit record highs (7.4 million and counting). In this blog, we flip the script on recruitment: it’s not just an HR activity, but a critical lever for improving patient outcomes. We’ll show that by filling vacancies faster and more efficiently, the NHS can see more patients, reduce waits, and even enhance the quality of care delivered.

It all starts with reimagining how we hire and onboard new healthcare professionals.

Vacancies = Patients Waiting

It’s a simple equation: if you don’t have enough doctors, nurses, or allied health staff, patients will wait longer. This might mean a clinic has fewer appointment slots, a surgical theater can’t run a full schedule, or a community care team has to triage only the most urgent cases. According to a 2023 Guardian report, 7.4 million people in England were waiting to start treatment, and health leaders largely attributed this to staff shortages across the system. Think about that – millions waiting, often in pain or deteriorating condition, because there aren’t enough clinicians available.

Staff shortages can literally be life-or-death. For instance, radiology groups have warned that lack of radiographers and radiologists leads to delayed cancer diagnoses. Similarly, insufficient nurses on wards can increase risks for patients (higher rates of complications, falls, etc. when nurse-to-patient ratios are poor). So every vacant position filled is potentially lives improved or saved.

Now, why are there so many vacancies? It’s true the NHS has trouble recruiting enough people overall (a supply issue), but part of the problem is also the time it takes to hire those who do apply. When it takes months to process a new hire, that vacancy stays open far longer than it should. Reducing that delay directly reduces the vacancy time, meaning patients feel the benefit sooner.

The Patient Impact of Faster Hiring

Let’s imagine two scenarios for a hospital department (say, orthopedics outpatient clinic):

• Scenario A: A consultant post is vacant. Traditional recruitment takes 4-5 months to fill it. During that time, the clinic runs at 80% capacity, and the waiting list for a routine ortho appointment grows from 6 weeks to 12 weeks. Patients in pain from arthritis wait extra time for consults, potentially their condition worsens or they keep visiting their GP for pain meds (adding load elsewhere).
• Scenario B: The same vacancy is filled in 4-5 weeks instead of months. The clinic is back to 100% capacity quickly; waiting times maybe bump to 7 weeks but then come back down when the new doctor starts. Fewer patients suffer prolonged discomfort, and some may avoid complications through earlier intervention.
  
  

This simplified example repeats across services. Faster hiring means:

• Shorter waiting lists: More staff available to treat patients translates to throughput. Whether it’s surgeries, GP appointments, therapy sessions, or imaging scans – each clinician hired faster is that service ramping up sooner. Over a year, that can equate to hundreds more patients seen per hire.
• Better continuity of care: Vacancies often mean use of temporary staff who rotate in and out. While we appreciate agency workers, continuity suffers if patients rarely see the same clinician. Filling a permanent post quickly restores consistent care. Continuity is linked to better health outcomes, especially in primary care and mental health services.
• Reduced cancellations and delays: Many NHS patients experience canceled operations or postponed appointments due to staffing issues (e.g., no anesthetist available, ward short of nurses so surgeries are rescheduled). By having positions filled, those disruptions are less frequent. This not only improves patient experience but can avoid the adverse health effects of delayed treatment.
• Enhanced patient safety: Adequate staffing is a known factor in patient safety. For example, nursing research shows that higher nurse staffing levels correlate with lower patient mortality and fewer errors. If we can hire nurses quicker and keep those posts filled, we maintain safer nurse-patient ratios. Similarly, a fully staffed pharmacy team means prescriptions get checked properly, reducing med errors. The list goes on.
  
  

There’s also the psychological aspect: patients waiting for care endure anxiety and stress. Faster hiring might seem indirect, but by reducing waits it can alleviate a lot of patient anxiety. Knowing that a service is well-staffed can also improve public confidence in the healthcare system.

Easing the Burden on Existing Staff (and Why Patients Benefit)

When a hospital or clinic is short-staffed, the people working there have to take on extra duties. A YouGov survey in 2024 found 70% of NHS workers had to take on more than their usual workload due to staff shortages. This often leads to burnout – a state of exhaustion that can impair decision-making and compassion. Overworked clinicians, despite their best intentions, may not be able to give as much attention to each patient. They might also be more prone to mistakes (simply from fatigue or rushing).

By contrast, when a team is fully staffed, everyone can focus properly on their patients. Consider a nurse on a ward: if she is covering 2 extra patients because of a vacancy, she has that much less time for rounding, patient education, double-checking medications, etc. Fill that vacancy, and now tasks can be allocated appropriately. The nurse can spend those crucial extra minutes communicating with a patient’s family or comforting someone in pain – things that improve care quality but are often first to be sacrificed under time pressure.

Another angle: staff morale. When employees see that their organisation is actively filling vacancies quickly, it boosts their morale – they feel supported. A happier workforce is generally correlated with better patient interactions. We’ve all been at an understaffed service where everyone is stressed – it affects the patient experience. Conversely, a well-staffed unit tends to have a more positive vibe, which patients notice.

Faster hiring, especially via efficient processes, also improves the caliber of staff who come on board (because you’re less likely to lose good candidates in a lengthy process). The NHS needs the best talent, and a cumbersome hiring approach can deter the best folks who have other options. By being nimble, you secure high-quality professionals who then provide high-quality care.

The Credentially Impact on Patient Care

Let’s tie in how a tool like Credentially specifically contributes here. Credentially shortens the gap between offer and a clinician actually starting work, by handling compliance and onboarding tasks quickly. One might ask: does shaving off a few weeks really matter to patients? The answer is yes, cumulatively:

• Example: A trust had a backlog in endoscopy because they were short two endoscopists (specialist doctors). Using an automated onboarding system, they managed to bring in two hires a month sooner than usual. That month saved meant dozens of patients got their endoscopy in June instead of July – a month earlier diagnosis for some colon cancer cases, which can be significant for outcomes.
• In another instance, an urgent care center using Credentially was able to onboard a wave of new clinicians in mere days when they expanded services. This meant their new urgent treatment centre opened on schedule with full staffing, immediately offering the community more same-day appointments. Without fast onboarding, they might have delayed opening or run limited hours, undermining the point of the new service.
  
  

These stories show that there’s a direct line from efficient hiring to patient access. Every time you remove a bottleneck in getting a healthcare worker through the door, you remove a bottleneck in patients receiving care.

Additionally, Credentially’s assurance of compliance (ensuring all credentials are verified) has patient safety implications. It means trusts aren’t rushing someone in without proper checks just to plug a gap – the platform ensures even in a fast process, nothing is skipped. Patients are thus cared for by fully vetted professionals. This is crucial for maintaining standards even as we speed things up.

A Virtuous Cycle: Better Care, Better Retention, Even Better Care

It’s worth noting the long-term feedback loop here. When hiring is efficient and staffing levels improve, staff morale and retention improve (people are less likely to quit a well-staffed, well-functioning team). Better retention means fewer new vacancies – which then means less strain on recruitment and a stable workforce for patients. It’s a virtuous cycle instead of the vicious one we often see.

On the patient side, better care outcomes and experiences can improve organisational reputation, which can make recruitment easier (people want to work at a successful, patient-centered place). So investing in faster hiring is like investing in the foundation that supports a high-performing health service.

Hiring Speed is a Patient Care Strategy

Usually, when we talk about improving patient outcomes, we think of medical advancements, better pathways, or increased funding. Those are all important, but this discussion shows that how fast we hire staff is an equally important piece of the puzzle. It’s a behind-the-scenes factor with front-line consequences.

For NHS managers and clinicians alike, it’s time to view efficient recruitment as part of our toolkit for patient care improvement. If you’re a department lead constantly struggling with vacancies, advocate for processes or tools that can accelerate hiring. If you’re on a committee for quality improvement, consider including recruitment metrics in your quality dashboards – because delays in staffing are delays in care.

The NHS has already identified workforce as a key challenge; now it must embrace solutions to tackle not just how many staff we need, but how quickly we can get them on board. As we’ve seen, solutions like automated credentialing can turn hiring from a sluggish bureaucratic process into a swift onboarding of much-needed hands on deck.

In practical terms, this means more doctors, nurses, and health professionals where patients need them, when they need them. It translates to fewer stories of patients waiting months in pain, or conditions worsening while in queue, or staff too stretched to smile. It means a healthier NHS workforce and healthier patients.

In surveys, NHS patients often say that what matters most is timely access to care and the feeling that the system has enough capacity to look after them. By fixing the recruitment delays, we’re directly addressing those concerns. Faster hiring truly is better care.

‍